Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Make it New: Sampling & Authorship

Make it New: Sampling & Authorship

In today’s music industry people are constantly trying to find a new sound to grab people’s attention and become the next big thing. There’s always something new that is being created, or something new that just hasn't been heard. One way people, artists, and record labels are attracting new people is through sampling. Sampling can take a classic beat or song and make it even more entertaining. Super Mash Bros tends to sample bits of popular music making a whole new song with clips that are mixed together. Sampling in simple terms is when a part of a song is taken and is reused as an instrument or sound recording in a whole new song. 

The big question is; are they actually making it new when they sample music? What about authorship? Sampling seems like it should or would be illegal in most cases, and most of the time it is illegal because artists won’t sample the music legally. Sampling is a very tricky thing because it can really screw a producer or artist over if they do not do it correctly.

Here are some guidelines to legally sampling music from the website

"Sample clearance" refers to the process of getting permission from the owners of the copyrighted music. Sampling music requires two sample clearances: 


·                     Clearance from the copyright owner of the SONG -- typically the music publisher
·                     Clearance from the copyright owner of the MASTER RECORDING -- typically the recording company
Find the Music Publisher 

In order to get these sample clearances; you will first need to find the copyright owners of the song and master recording. The music publisher is typically the easiest to find; so, start there. Performing rights organizations, like Broadcast Music Incorporated (BMI) or the American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers (ASCAP), collect money for public performances of artists' music. Therefore, these organizations are a good place to locate the publisher. 

So chances are, you are probably sampling illegally. However, you more than likely have no chance at all at contacting the publisher, nor the record label. You also have a good chance of never getting caught using that sample. So it is a double-edged sword if you ask me. The bottom line is, a law is a law and what you may be doing in your music is illegal. 

 
 Although it is illegal to take a beat or part of a song if the original artist claimed authorship, there are times where an artist will obtain authorship for a song but won’t specify exactly what they want to copyright.

According to http://www.musiccopyrightnow.com/How-To-Copyright-Songs-Authorship.html , in order to copyright your music correctly you must,

First, define the nature of your Authorship. This is not particularly hard, but most song copyright information sources on the net gloss over or ignore this important subject.
You write and record a song - that's great. What do you own? What are you the author of? What parts of "your" authorship are exclusively yours?
In most cases, there are four parts of a musical work in which you can have an authorship interest:
1. The Music
2. The Lyrics
3. The Performance session where the song is RECORDED
tion and/or Engineering of the Recording

The last two, recording and production are curious. Read on to discover how to copyright songs AND keep the engineer and the studio from obtaining authorship interests in your work. Don't unwittingly give away interests in your work.
Let's say you come up with some great tunes and dynamic lyrics. Next you assemble some musicians and run down to your local studio so the world can hear your work.
What have you got?
Parts 1 and 2 above, the music and lyrics, are the underlying work. Those are yours and you can Register your copyright interest.
Parts 3 and 4, studio performances and engineering, relate to something defined by the U.S. Copyright Act as a "sound recording". A copyright interest in sound recordings can be Registered, just like the underlying work.
The guy you asked to come to the studio to play bass and the engineer you asked to twist the knobs may have authorship interests in that sound recording of "your" song. It's not the end of the world, because they have no right to Register a copyright in the underlying work. And, if you've Registered your work, you can shut them down and make them pay dearly if they use your song without permission and/or without paying for a license. But why give them any piece of your copyright?

In conclusion, new music has to be very careful with both sampling and getting authorship. Gaining authorship for a song is quite the process, and you have to make sure to specify when gaining authorship what exactly you want to have control over. Also, when artists sample music they have to be really careful they do it legally or don’t get caught. Many artists and producers often get sued for using other artist’s music without permission. Vanilla Ice actually sampled the beat from “Under Pressure” in his hit song “Ice Ice Baby”, but Vanilla Ice never gave credit to Queen and David Bowie until confronted years later. This is a perfect example of sampling incorrectly and not making it new!


19 comments:

  1. I like the added videos you have for your blog, but I wish you had given more examples of sampling. All in all Good Work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought it was really interesting that you used Vanilla Ice using Queen's beats as an example. I had heard about that issue on the radio a while back and never really thought anything of it until now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like the Queen & Vanilla Ice example a lot. Lots of "YouTubers" like the Super Smash Bros sample songs for purely entertainment purposes. Lots of comedians post parodies of popular songs to gain views. In my opinion, since it's so hard to gain permission to sample a song, as long as the person using the sample is using it for entertainment purposes and isn't seeking profit from it (i.e selling their parody/sample on iTunes), then I don't believe there's a problem with someone sampling a certain song :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. My favorite thing about sampling is when a contemporary hip hop artist samples a super old song that may be orchestral or soul derived and makes it sound like an harmonious whole by layering it with drums, electronic effects, adding rap verses and a hook over it. To me this is the dopest way to make innovative hip hop even though it may have elements of an old song sampled underneath the new layers. I remember times when I've found out part of a song was actually a sample, gone back and listened to the sampled song itself and thought, "how did the artist listen to this song and take a portion of it and decide what to manipulate/add to it and make this part plus the new components into a whole song of their own. Some of my favorite examples of this are:

    Wiz Khalifa's "Visions" samples Cortex's "Huit Octobre 1971"
    song: http://youtu.be/E8HsKVpSj8M
    sampled song: http://youtu.be/XZQJSa2M2a4

    another one of my favorites is Kendrick & Dre's "The Recipie" which features a sample of The Twin Sister's "Meet the Frownies"
    song: http://youtu.be/RJc0M4CjmNg
    sampled song: http://youtu.be/or8DEcXVKSk

    and finally one of the assigned song's on our Spotify playlist this week "Stan" by Eminem samples Dido's "Thank You"
    song: http://youtu.be/gOMhN-hfMtY
    sampled song: http://youtu.be/LFRm2srRC64

    A great place to look up songs and see their samples is WhoSampled.com
    If you go on and search around you'll probably find that a lot more songs include samples than you may expect.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sampling has become a very big part of music and I definitely agree with what you have to say. Made solid points and explained your topic very clearly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like the example you gave of Vanilla Ice sampling from Queen and I also like that you actually included the videos in your blog. Just like Chelsea, I had heard about this issue a while back because my older brother likes Queen a lot and he was talking about it but I never really paid much attention to it until you mentioned it in your blog. It would've been nice if you had another example or two of artists sampling from other artists' songs though, but overall it was very informative. Nice work!

    ReplyDelete
  7. A good example that you could have used for this post is The Grey Album by Danger Mouse.He sampled Jay-Z's "Black Album" and The Beatles "White Album" without permission from the labels who tried to halt its distribution. You made a good point and explained the whole process of sampling very well.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Are they actually making it new when they sample music?"

    I like to believe that yes, they're creating new music. Sure, they're using previously made music (i.e., beats, lyrics, etc) but that's what music is about.

    Hip hop wasn't the first genre to "sample". Take it back a few years to Jazz. What is improvising? Technically is "composing on the spot", but it takes so much more than just thinking playing a combination of twelve notes.

    Any jazz musician will tell you that their secrets of improv success is taking "licks", or in Hip Hop terms "samples", of previous jazz giants like Charlie Parker or John Coltrane.

    Same thing applies to when jazz musicians "trade 4"s. This means two musicians will take turns improving 4 bars. Sounds a lot like a rap battle is they were using rhymes instead of horns.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I don't really feel like sampling music is making it new... i guess its more of just putting a different spin on it. I see it more of as paying homage to the original song... like in mixtapes when they rap on a beat that was used previously... like when Nicki Minaj did her own version of Lil Kim's "Jump Off" on her first mixtape, Playtime is Over, she was paying homage. But her new verse on the track didn't necessarily make it a "new sound", she's just reusing a commercially successful track.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think that sampling reduces originality and creativity to hip hop. These are not your own thoughts and ideas you are just elaborating on them with a catchy beat.For example Flo Rida most of his songs have sampling but with a crazy beat he has made it work to his advantage but cost him money from law suits.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree that sampling songs can make for great music, but at what point is it copyright infringement?

    I guess like Allegra said it may be when someone seeks profit from it. Thousands of mixtapes, including popular ones from Lil Wayne, Wiz, etc. use almost all sampled sound, yet it doesnt receive much notice.

    Interesting thought though, can a group like supermash bros or any artist who samples copyright a mashup of all copyrighted songs? whose to say someone cant sample part of a supermash bro's sample and make profit from it?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think that the process that artist (especially new artist) have to go through to be able to legally sample others music would slow the growth of not only hip hop but other music genres as well. It's easy to gain the music illegally. Trying to get music legally presents obstacles and the more obstacles that are presented the less appeal the music industry has, thus slowing the growth and expansion of the music industry. Also, it seems that most artist who's songs have been "sampled" or "Ripped off" don't usually take action until the song has gotten famous enough. Like if I were to make a song by taking samples from 50 cent, Kanye West, or Linkin Park illegally and it got 100 views on youtube. I highly doubt that any of those artist are going to take me to court. However, If my video went viral then that's when legal action would be taken. I think this only happens because the music making business is a money making business, and if anyone ever feels cheated out of some money most of the time they'll come after you. I definately agree with you when you say that you have the chance of never getting caught, but most people make music hoping that it will be heard across the world so if you're taking samples for your music it would be best to obtain it legally just in case.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I had no idea it was such a long and confusing process. Now I know why they are angry when people steal music.

    ReplyDelete
  14. When it comes to sampling I think the artist the sample is created by should be given credit for the sample in some way or another; However, I think that the copyright restrictions on samples should be relatively lenient.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I love the act of sampling due to the fact that it allows artists to create their own twist on music from sounds bits that piqued their interest. For example, in the album "Watch the Throne" by Jay-Z and Kanye West, some songs include a sample from the opening of the show "Dexter." One of the songs, "No Church in the Wild," includes this sample at the 4:10 minute mark. http://youtu.be/M37VucWh06Y

    ReplyDelete
  16. Im glad that the subject of sampling was touched on. Sampling is a HUGE part of today's hip hop. I don,t know how many times an artists album has been delayed because they had to get sample clearances (Drake's Take Care is a good example). Kanye (YEEZY!) is widely known as a producer who is heavy on the samples (since '98 son). Nowadays,if an artist has a very large amount of samples being used on an EP, they typically release it as a free album, or "mixtape". The meaning of mixtapes has drastically changed since hip hop has started. They have gone from actually being DJ mixes on cassette tapes to a way for artist to showcase their talents without needing all the funds to launch an album.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Without sampling i think a huge part of hiphop would be missing. What would the hiphop world be without the millions of mixtapes that heavily rely on sampling or even the artists such as the mentioned super mash bros who rely soley on samples.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I like the fact that you addressed sampling in both positive and negative aspects, while also addressing the legality issue with sampling. I feel as if you could have thrown in a little more examples of songs that were being sampled and talked a little more on the roots of sampling.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I like that you expressed both the positive and negative things. However I wish you stuck more to one side because I feel you would have a stronger argument.

    ReplyDelete